.
Feedback

It's Time to Ban Semiautomatic Weapons

Since the federal assault weapons ban expired in 2004, eight mass shootings in America that killed 129 people combined involved legally purchased semiautomatic weapons.

 

Like all parents of young children, I was shaken by the tragedy in Connecticut, especially as the events unfolded while my kids were at their own elementary school.

I cannot imagine the pain the parents of the victims must be feeling, and hope the outpouring of support from the nation lets them know they are not alone in their mourning.

Since the tragedy, much has been written and said trying to make sense of the events of Dec. 14, and the seemingly increasing senseless violence in our country. Over the past six years, the United States has seen some of its worst mass murders in history:

•April 16, 2007 - Virginia Tech University in Blacksburg, Va., 32 killed;

•Dec. 5, 2007 - Westroads Mall, Omaha, Neb., 8 killed; 

•Feb. 14, 2008 - Northern Illinois University in DeKalb, Ill., 5 killed;

•April 3, 2009 - American Civic Association in Binghamton, NY, 13 killed;

•Nov. 5, 2009 - Fort Hood, Texas, 13 killed;

•Aug. 3, 2010 - Harford Beer Distributor in Manchester, Conn., 8 killed;

•Jan. 8, 2011 - Rep. Gabriel Giffords appearance in Tuscon, Ariz., 6 killed;

•July 20, 2012 - Movie Theater in Aurora, Colo., 12 killed;

•Aug. 5, 2012 - Sikh Temple in Oak Creek, Wis., 6 killed;

•Dec. 14, 2012 - Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., 26 killed.

Each event featured one sole assailant, and these murderers of the 129 victims have one thing in common -- they all used legally purchased semiautomatic weapons to conduct their killing sprees. In nine of the 10 cases, the semiautomatic guns were purchased by the perpetrator himself (the Westroads Mall shooter stole the gun from his stepfather). Assault weapons serve one main purpose -- to kill multitudes in a short amount of time. It’s how 10 killers single-handedly murdered 129 people in the aforementioned tragedies. 

In 1994, with overwhelming bipartisan support, the federal government passed an assault weapons ban. The ban expired in 2004. During the 10 years the law was in place, there were eight mass shootings resulting in 51 deaths. According to the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City, six of the eight massacres involved semiautomatic weapons purchased legally before the assault weapons ban took effect in 1994. The two mass shootings featuring illegally acquired weapons -- Columbine in 1999 and Edgewater Technology in 2000 -- resulted in 20 combined deaths.

Doing the math, over the past 18 years, mass shootings involving legally purchased assault weapons resulted in 160 innocent deaths, while mass shootings involving illegally purchased assault weapons resulted in 20 deaths.

Obviously, assault weapons and the ease of purchasing them is not the sole reason 160 people have lost their lives. However, one cannot deny the link between the spike in mass killings and the expiration of the assault weapons ban.

For the 20 children shot multiple times in a matter of minutes last Friday; for the 129 murdered over the past eight years by legally purchased semiautomatic weapons; and to reduce a legitimate threat to safety of all Americans, the government needs to restore a ban on semiautomatic weapons.

Ed Varn December 27, 2012 at 11:29 pm
It is important to remember that governments have killed more of their own people than all of the non-government criminals combined. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. If that doesn't trouble you, you have way too much faith in government.
Tammy Osier December 28, 2012 at 12:14 am
I heard something today to the tune of "enforcing" what we already have on the books. I'm all for huge penalties where it isn't enforced. Kind of like convenience stores that sell to minors; they should have huge penalties to the point of being prosecuted. Both are inconsistent across the board.
Tim December 28, 2012 at 10:37 am
Very good point Ed, excellent!
Tim December 28, 2012 at 10:38 am
very true Tammy, well said!
thcooper69 December 29, 2012 at 12:48 am
chicago is is a good example of how gun banning works so well ! in the las year alone
512 deaths /murders with mostly semiautomatic weapons.
Tim December 29, 2012 at 01:32 am
http://news.yahoo.com/chicago-reaches-500-homicides-fatal-shooting-145951769.html
Karsten Torch December 29, 2012 at 01:18 pm
But...but...but...that can't be the case! Guns are illegal there!
Oh My God!!!! You mean criminals aren't paying attention to the laws? What is this world coming to???????
Good Grief Y'all January 1, 2013 at 12:40 am
The new ban will have to be better, closing all loopholes. I don't think it would be at all hard to define "assault" or high capacity clips.
Steven Neeb January 6, 2013 at 07:11 am
Laws have never prevented a crime. They only make them punishable after being caught. People commit crimes out of need, greed, and sometimes just plain insanity. The fear of punishment only makes the criminal more cautious about how, where, and to whom they commit their crimes. Diminishing free law abiding citizens ability to defend themselves only makes them easy targets. Magazine capacity ? How many rounds is too much to survive say four or five intruders at night where some missed shots seem likely? I prefer 20 rounders but if someone wanted a hundred round magazine why not? If they are defending their lives and their childrens lives how can you say that's unlawful. This cannot be allowed, If we give an inch I'm afraid they'll take a mile.
Good Grief Y'all January 7, 2013 at 05:11 pm
"Laws have never prevented a crime." There's no way to prove that.
Do away with all laws and there's no crime.
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 09:10 pm
Ooh, ooh, I know. Let's make it illegal to drink alcohol and operate motor vehicles! That'll work, right? Because everybody obeys the law!
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 09:16 pm
You're right - nobody's going to change their minds here. Those that either look at facts (gun control has never worked, assault weapons were illegal when Columbine took place and are currently illegal in Connecticut - made no difference, and most shootings of this type take place in gun-free zones) and those that ignore the facts. If you ignore the facts now, no reason to think that will change....
Good Grief Y'all January 7, 2013 at 09:59 pm
Actually, Karsten, DUI laws and punishments have curtailed accidents and roadway deaths. Comparing motor vehicles and firearms is a distraction. Look at R's comment just above yours - he's taking his argument to the war zone in the Middle East to try and prove his point - now that's quite the stretch.
Good Grief Y'all January 7, 2013 at 10:03 pm
You cannot measure or gauge what has not occurred.
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:34 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0R3uLTnzs60&sns=fb
This says pretty succinctly why everybody should be able to own an "assault" weapon. And yes, it's in quotes because I've noticed that nobody out here really knows what an assault weapon really is. Seems to be, if it's scary, it's an assault weapon...
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:43 pm
Yeah, sorry. Not quite. Violent crime has risen. Murder rates dropped, but only at a rate similar to the US's rate.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17847 The UK is even worse. Break ins, assaults - especially against the elderly, even the murder rate has stayed steady. This is despite a lack of guns in the country. The difference is, now it's just the victims dying, rather than a mix of victims and criminals. The criminals love it there now. They have nothing to fear....
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Not many. Unless you're working guard duty on the base, you don't get a gun. Weapons are checked at the gate. So...yeah, fairly gun-free.
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:49 pm
"but I'm waiting to hear a rational argument against gun control."
No you're not. You've already made up your mind. Lots of stats here to support the idea that gun control is ineffective. Or, how about this one - Vermont. No permit required for carry if you're a resident of the state. None. No registration, either. Third safest state in the nation. Wonder how that could be with such a proliferation of guns?
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:50 pm
Easy access. Just had to kill her to get them, but yeah, it was easy. <smh>
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 10:52 pm
Or it could be the new police officers he put on the streets. With a what, 6% reduction in crime?
I remember New Orleans did the same thing. And left guns alone. While that was the case, they saw a better than 30% reduction in crime. But you're right, I'm sure it has everything to do with the guns. Actually, come to think of it, New York would probably have seen a better reduction in crime had they left guns alone, too....
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 11:03 pm
Yeah, that's the problem. The flow of weapons from Georgia to these other crazy places that don't trust their citizens. Of course it is. Because more guns move from Georgia to Chicago than stay in Georgia.
Did you actually read this statement before you posted it?
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 11:06 pm
"And you have no response for those countries that provide comparable overall freedom to the US and still manage to keep gun violence low. "
Like....
Karsten Torch January 7, 2013 at 11:07 pm
See, that was just snarky. And pointless.
But yes, if you do away with all laws, there will be no crime. Because if it's not against the law, it's not a crime. Duh.....
Good Grief Y'all January 7, 2013 at 11:37 pm
Not at all snarky, but I recognize your right to your opinion. You can't prove what hasn't happened or why it hasn't happened. 'Cause it didn't happen.
The second sentence was a separate thought, but not intended to be snarky, just a little sarcastic. I'm surprised you didn't recognize that Karsten, as you're the Patch sarcasm king and proud of it, aren't you? And, didn't you get the memo about retiring "Duh"? ;)
R January 8, 2013 at 02:28 am
"And per your critique of the list of countries in which gun regulations are working better than the US, they may allow less freedom overall in some cases but you don't deny there is less gun violence."
So a dictator that can kill his people/slaves on a whim is a valid comparison? Well a broken analog watch is always right twice each and EVERY day too, but not really desirable timepiece in the real world.
R January 8, 2013 at 02:32 am
"Do away with all laws and there's no crime."
GGY has a point on this one because that what's happening with our border policy RIGHT now, one regulation at a time...
Shibone January 8, 2013 at 11:38 am
Other societies watch video games and movies and don't slaughter their own. That's because they don't have an NRA that supports assault weapons with high capacity magazines. Since when does providing some measure of protection for children in school constitute an agenda? I would suggest you have an agenda that includes making sure mass murderers have the weapons and means to carry out their plans.
Shibone January 8, 2013 at 12:20 pm
Tim, in another blog posting you said the following: "According to the Georgia Sex Offender Registry, there are 17 "registered" sexual predators and offenders within a 5 mile radius of where I live in Loganville. Not to mention the unregistered and other felons and criminals that are talented in other wicked ways."
Hey fella, if you choose to live in a penal colony, that is your decision but I don't think it qualifies as a reason for everyone to buy more guns and ammo and arm themselves to the teeth. You have the option to move any time you want. Stop blogging and talk to a real estate agent. And for the record, I have worked in Loganville and know people from there and they all aren't "registered" sexual predators, felons and criminals that are talented in other wicked ways. How about stepping outside your bunker and just smell the roses?
Karsten Torch January 8, 2013 at 03:15 pm
Wow, once again, somebody that hasn't paid any attention to facts. But, Shibone, you keep going with your gut on this one, the rest of us will pay attention to how things actually work....
Good Grief Y'all January 8, 2013 at 09:06 pm
A man who knows the subject well:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/08/stanley-mcchrystal-gun-control_n_2431063.html

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Athens Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Janet G. June 18, 2013 at 05:30 pm
We are so thankful for the recognition and this kind article. Our friend Mary Charles Howard'sRead More company did the landscaping and we are so pleased with the results. Sincerely, Janet Geddis, owner Avid Bookshop